Blub blubbity blub
we have shipped all the s**t out - agreed
have competition for places - agreed
a team spirit - agreed
and we are winning games- agreed
as far as most "intelligent" supporters are concerned, however we got there is up to Roeder - agreed
All utterly obvious and uncontroversial points, which have got nothing to do with Roeder's treatment of Huckerby.
"Roeder is only stating a matter of fact" - now that I don't agree with. What Roeder is saying (as Maillot Jaune has correctly deciphered) is "the way I've treated him has nothing to do with why he's leaving". I suspect that's not so; I suspect Hucks would love another year here. I also think it's disingenuous for Roeder to be pretending that he's got an open mind about Hucks
But the real point is footballing reasons. If you were a Chumps right back, would you rather be up against Gibbs or Hucks? Especially for the last 30 mins. Hucks isn't past it yet, this isn't like Iwan (whose fitness had just gone). I just don't agree with leaving a player as good as Hucks out of the SQUAD, especially in favour of Gibbs
Posted By: Old Git on February 15th 2008 at 11:44:29
Message Thread
- Bye bye Hucks.... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 10:53:38
- "I've had a chance to make my mind up, Huckerby has made his own mind up that he's leaving (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:16:46
- To me it sounds more like (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 15, 11:51:51
- ... (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 15, 11:45:50
- oh, and Hucks was in the squad against Hull not left out of it (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Feb 15, 11:56:14
- I' don't think this is buck passing, its just an off-hand comment... (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Feb 15, 11:34:18
- "to let everyone know that Hucks made the decision to quit not him getting rid of a City (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:37:52
- You really are a complete twat (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:24:09
- Why on earth should you think that playing Hucks rather than Gibbs would send us down? (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:28:23
- I didn't say anything about Gibbs (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:37:46
- Blub blubbity blub (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:44:29
- You're the one that's blubbing. (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:51:52
- Blub blubbity blub (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:44:29
- I didn't say anything about Gibbs (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Feb 15, 11:37:46
- Why on earth should you think that playing Hucks rather than Gibbs would send us down? (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:28:23
- Prob a bit of a 'six of one, half a dozen of the other' (n/m) (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 11:19:29
- shut up you idiot (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Feb 15, 11:19:07
- I don't think that criticising Roeder's treatment of Hucks makes me an idiot (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:23:53
- you think on recent performances hucks deserves a place in the team? (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Feb 15, 11:27:33
- Yes, at least for 30 mins super-subbing (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:29:09
- I expect a lot more from Gibbs in his next game... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 11:33:19
- Bertrand has been good (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:36:43
- I expect a lot more from Gibbs in his next game... (NCFC) - DemoniCanary, Feb 15, 11:33:19
- Yes, at least for 30 mins super-subbing (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:29:09
- you think on recent performances hucks deserves a place in the team? (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, Feb 15, 11:27:33
- I don't think that criticising Roeder's treatment of Hucks makes me an idiot (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:23:53
- "I've had a chance to make my mind up, Huckerby has made his own mind up that he's leaving (NCFC) - Old Git, Feb 15, 11:16:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.