Roeder has said we can't get them, so for both footballing matters and yeah some loyality

... to hucks lets play him. I could except if we had the next big thing coming through on the left, yes it's a shame but let's call it a day on hucks first team career but no it's some f**king useless kids that know nothing of this league and aren't and won't be ours to keep played ahead. That annoys me.

Posted By: greendude on February 12th 2008 at 23:27:25

Message Thread

Hucks is the same as any squad player and I have no problem with him being kept out a... (NCFC) - greendude, Feb 12, 23:17:09
- The argument that putting in Gibbs rather than Hucks equals short-termism doesn't add up (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 12, 23:23:05
  - Roeder has said we can't get them, so for both footballing matters and yeah some loyality (NCFC) - greendude, Feb 12, 23:27:25
    - Sorry, but calling Kerron Gobbs a "fucking useless kid"... (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 12, 23:43:58
      - He'll be a good player - in a year or two (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:50:26
  - Hucks wants to stay - quite why people think he doesn't (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:23:50
    - he's out of here, whether he wants to stay or not (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 23:29:12
    - I didn't say *he* didn't want to stay... (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 12, 23:26:17
      - Dion's off. Leave him out too. (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:27:16
        
        Well, there's a big difference there... (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 12, 23:29:15
        
        OK, hypothetical, but let's say we had (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:30:33
        
        Clearly, Roader did think that Gibbs was the right choice tonight ahead of Hucks (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 12, 23:34:41
        
        You didn't answer the question (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:36:34
        
        I was arguing that you shouldn't pick Huckerby *just* because he's not a loanee (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 12, 23:39:02
        
        I don't think he set out to lose obviously (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:53:09
        
        Course he feels a duty to play gibbs, like he feels the duty to play hux (NCFC) - pants, Feb 13, 00:01:34
        
        He played Gibbs and not Hucks (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 13, 00:08:33
        
        you're saying because of one decision to play gibbs that he was (NCFC) - pants, Feb 13, 00:24:00
        
        Under pressure to play him (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 13, 00:25:30
        
        sorry, if he felt under pressure for that, he'd feel under pressure in his own job (NCFC) - pants, Feb 13, 00:39:09
        
        Oh, I accept that element of the argument (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 12, 23:56:16
        
        Yeah - I'm allowed to disagree though (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 13, 00:02:09
        
        Course you are - I'm not pants ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - Orlando, Feb 13, 00:12:47
        
        bit of sense doy, chose to accept it (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 23:50:12
- Not allowed constructive criticism here (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:21:56
  - ok, so if Roeder plays Huckerby every game, then gets his replacement (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 23:25:53
    - I cannot decipher that (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:26:27
      - classic (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 23:27:28
        
        No, really, I couldn't (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:28:40
        
        truth hurts (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 12, 23:43:22
        
        That you're semi literate, yeah (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 23:51:03
        
        lol (NCFC) - pants, Feb 13, 00:02:15
        
        No they don't (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 13, 00:08:50

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.