Which yesterday then brought about the theories on the sly that
Roeder isn't up to it, because he's the first manager here to stand up to huckerby's blubs
Yet in another breath, it's a fine strength that he takes no s**t off anyone
When it suits, you can prove your point with the same example, that's what I'm saying, but it becomes a game of contridiction when you actually disect it
Posted By: pants on February 5th 2008 at 12:44:46
Message Thread
- Ian Murrays Diatribe (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Feb 5, 10:23:40
- what an idiot Murray is.... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 5, 10:59:50
- Where is the interview? I can't find it on the pinkun website. Thanks (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, Feb 5, 10:52:54
- Tint in the Pink 'Un. It was a scottish paper. The Scotsman? Suffen like that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 5, 10:54:41
- Found it below..sorry! (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, Feb 5, 10:54:25
- He didn't like it up him did he! (NCFC) - bongo33, Feb 5, 10:46:55
- Further proof that Grant is Brian Hamilton Mk2 (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Feb 5, 10:42:10
- Both useless cunts. (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Feb 5, 10:42:38
- Anyone think Roeder is probably the new Nigel Worthington but a bit better? (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Feb 5, 10:44:23
- What he's got loads of money to spend, has rubbish loan signings, and will be relying on (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 11:15:37
- worst argument ever (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 5, 11:56:35
- relative to how you seen in hindsight isn't it? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:19:57
- I'm sticking my neck out here, but I reckon that if Grant hadn't left (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:22:54
- That isn't the point I just made though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:24:55
- Should mention, I mean last season (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:29:38
- I don't even know what your point is (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 5, 12:29:14
- I think he means... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:31:46
- He's referring to 2006-7 I think, when Grant managed not to relegate us. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:08
- Which is now largely the same side he can't get in (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:36:04
- Which every fan can see is bollocks... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:41:34
- Which yesterday then brought about the theories on the sly that (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:44:46
- No i think roeder is doing a good job, (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:02:04
- Again, I think it's a shame to even think like that when we're unbeaten (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:04:16
- Its his last season by roders choice though is it not? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:08:53
- I reckon it's his last season through a decision by the club (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:13:41
- Its his last season by roders choice though is it not? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:08:53
- Again, I think it's a shame to even think like that when we're unbeaten (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:04:16
- No i think roeder is doing a good job, (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:02:04
- Which yesterday then brought about the theories on the sly that (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:44:46
- Apart from Pattison, Gibbs, Henry, Bertrand and Evans. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:39:04
- Which every fan can see is bollocks... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:41:34
- Which is now largely the same side he can't get in (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:36:04
- He's referring to 2006-7 I think, when Grant managed not to relegate us. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:08
- I think Worthington is a one hit wonder (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:31:25
- How do you explain 2001-2002, then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:23
- wonga (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:35:16
- We hardly spent any money prior to the champ year... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:43:34
- Yes but in the play off year, he spent about 2m, and got us to the play offs (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:49:17
- You could say that about anyone couldn't you? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:07:15
- play off signings (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:41:48
- spending the money on emblen had nothing to do with the play off season though did it... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 14:25:13
- play off signings (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:41:48
- You could say that about anyone couldn't you? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:07:15
- Yes but in the play off year, he spent about 2m, and got us to the play offs (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:49:17
- Not good enough - other teams in the division spent a lot more that season. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:36:22
- We hardly spent any money prior to the champ year... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:43:34
- wonga (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:35:16
- How do you explain 2001-2002, then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:23
- I think he means... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:31:46
- That isn't the point I just made though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:24:55
- I'm sticking my neck out here, but I reckon that if Grant hadn't left (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:22:54
- relative to how you seen in hindsight isn't it? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:19:57
- worst argument ever (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 5, 11:56:35
- Like I'm the new Southampton Rob but a bit better. (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, Feb 5, 10:52:15
- No. Daft question. (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Feb 5, 10:49:18
- Well obviously (NCFC) - King, Feb 5, 10:49:04
- What he's got loads of money to spend, has rubbish loan signings, and will be relying on (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 11:15:37
- Anyone think Roeder is probably the new Nigel Worthington but a bit better? (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Feb 5, 10:44:23
- Both useless cunts. (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Feb 5, 10:42:38
- Wanker (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Feb 5, 10:31:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.