I'm sticking my neck out here, but I reckon that if Grant hadn't left
we might just have been relegated this season.
Controversial, I know.
Posted By: Ottosson Foxtrot on February 5th 2008 at 12:22:54
Message Thread
- Ian Murrays Diatribe (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Feb 5, 10:23:40
- what an idiot Murray is.... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 5, 10:59:50
- Where is the interview? I can't find it on the pinkun website. Thanks (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, Feb 5, 10:52:54
- Tint in the Pink 'Un. It was a scottish paper. The Scotsman? Suffen like that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 5, 10:54:41
- Found it below..sorry! (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, Feb 5, 10:54:25
- He didn't like it up him did he! (NCFC) - bongo33, Feb 5, 10:46:55
- Further proof that Grant is Brian Hamilton Mk2 (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Feb 5, 10:42:10
- Both useless cunts. (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Feb 5, 10:42:38
- Anyone think Roeder is probably the new Nigel Worthington but a bit better? (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Feb 5, 10:44:23
- What he's got loads of money to spend, has rubbish loan signings, and will be relying on (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 11:15:37
- worst argument ever (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 5, 11:56:35
- relative to how you seen in hindsight isn't it? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:19:57
- I'm sticking my neck out here, but I reckon that if Grant hadn't left (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:22:54
- That isn't the point I just made though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:24:55
- Should mention, I mean last season (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:29:38
- I don't even know what your point is (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 5, 12:29:14
- I think he means... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:31:46
- He's referring to 2006-7 I think, when Grant managed not to relegate us. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:08
- Which is now largely the same side he can't get in (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:36:04
- Which every fan can see is bollocks... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:41:34
- Which yesterday then brought about the theories on the sly that (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:44:46
- No i think roeder is doing a good job, (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:02:04
- Again, I think it's a shame to even think like that when we're unbeaten (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:04:16
- Its his last season by roders choice though is it not? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:08:53
- I reckon it's his last season through a decision by the club (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:13:41
- Its his last season by roders choice though is it not? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:08:53
- Again, I think it's a shame to even think like that when we're unbeaten (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:04:16
- No i think roeder is doing a good job, (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:02:04
- Which yesterday then brought about the theories on the sly that (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:44:46
- Apart from Pattison, Gibbs, Henry, Bertrand and Evans. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:39:04
- Which every fan can see is bollocks... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:41:34
- Which is now largely the same side he can't get in (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:36:04
- He's referring to 2006-7 I think, when Grant managed not to relegate us. (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:08
- I think Worthington is a one hit wonder (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:31:25
- How do you explain 2001-2002, then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:23
- wonga (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:35:16
- We hardly spent any money prior to the champ year... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:43:34
- Yes but in the play off year, he spent about 2m, and got us to the play offs (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:49:17
- You could say that about anyone couldn't you? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:07:15
- play off signings (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:41:48
- spending the money on emblen had nothing to do with the play off season though did it... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 14:25:13
- play off signings (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 13:41:48
- You could say that about anyone couldn't you? (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 13:07:15
- Yes but in the play off year, he spent about 2m, and got us to the play offs (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:49:17
- Not good enough - other teams in the division spent a lot more that season. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:36:22
- We hardly spent any money prior to the champ year... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:43:34
- wonga (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:35:16
- How do you explain 2001-2002, then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:34:23
- I think he means... (NCFC) - Alan, Feb 5, 12:31:46
- That isn't the point I just made though (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:24:55
- I'm sticking my neck out here, but I reckon that if Grant hadn't left (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Feb 5, 12:22:54
- relative to how you seen in hindsight isn't it? (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 12:19:57
- worst argument ever (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 5, 11:56:35
- Like I'm the new Southampton Rob but a bit better. (n/m) (NCFC) - Auckland Roeder, Feb 5, 10:52:15
- No. Daft question. (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Feb 5, 10:49:18
- Well obviously (NCFC) - King, Feb 5, 10:49:04
- What he's got loads of money to spend, has rubbish loan signings, and will be relying on (NCFC) - pants, Feb 5, 11:15:37
- Anyone think Roeder is probably the new Nigel Worthington but a bit better? (n/m) (NCFC) - iwans_ex_dentist, Feb 5, 10:44:23
- Both useless cunts. (n/m) (NCFC) - Snakey, Feb 5, 10:42:38
- Wanker (NCFC) - Buckscanary, Feb 5, 10:31:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.