i really don't think that it should be structured so that one individual player

gets labelled as "The Kitty Player". The scheme would then hang on the success of that player - if he turned out to be a bad/indifferent buy (always possible) the whole thing would fizzle

Much better (if this is to be done) for the funds just to go into the pot available for transfer fees (and wages)

Posted By: Old Git on January 23rd 2008 at 13:02:13

Message Thread

Carrow Roeder's idea would carry more weight if there was an incentive (NCFC) - pants, Jan 23, 12:49:24
- What? player asked tp donate wages to a club's (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 23, 13:02:08
- Pants we are looking at incentives for various levels of contribution (n/m) (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 23, 12:52:25
  - Cool. Any level of commitment persuades people to put in (NCFC) - pants, Jan 23, 12:55:21
    - i really don't think that it should be structured so that one individual player (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 23, 13:02:13
      - This is why I need an incentive to do it (NCFC) - pants, Jan 23, 13:05:00
  - What kind of thing? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jan 23, 12:54:18
    - I don't really know, we looked at special pre season friendlies for contributors (NCFC) - CarrowRoeder, Jan 23, 13:00:17

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.