Wow, I shoulod come on at this time more often, no children, only grown ups
Well except tudders, of course
I'm writing this sort of thing, Otto
I could not follow what you were trying to say on pages 160-161. First you say “Preachers who say that it is always God’s will to heal simply have no theology of suffering.” Then you say “Let’s be absolutely clear: While suffering is part and parcel of the Christian life, God hates it as much as we do.” I ended up simply not understanding what you were saying, since the second sentence (with which I agree) contradicts the first (with which I profoundly disagree).
The reason that I disagree so strongly with the first assertion is that it is implicit within it that sometimes it is God’s will that people are ill. To say that it is His “will” involves saying that it is His desire. His aim, His intention, His purpose. A statement that He wants people to have cancer, or Alzheimers, or MS. Or indeed brain tumours and epilepsy.
I can’t accept that, and I do not think that there is anything wrong with my theology of suffering. I believe that God made the world free from these sicknesses and all other evils; I believe that the world as we know it is not as He intended it to be; and I believe that the world is going to be recreated in the form in which He intended it to be (Hosea 2:18; Isaiah 11:6-9). All this is perfectly orthodox (“Orthodoxy is my doxy”, of course, as some ancient Bishop of Gloucester remarked, “and heterodoxy is another man’s doxy”.) In other words, God intends when His kingdom comes to restore the world to its original state, and therefore intends to banish all sickness. How, then, shall we say that it is ever His desire that anyone suffer illness? How can illness ever be anything but an abomination in His eyes? How can it ever be other than His will that people are healed?
Of course it may be that from time to time God does something amazing through someone’s illness. I have friend with chronic kidney disease. He would tell you that what he has been through (the failed transplant from his mother, the medical bafflement, the endless hours of pain, the non-functioning body, the unanswered prayers and so on) have brought him many blessings. Does that mean that God wanted him to have chronic kidney disease? No. It means that evil may be harnessed by God; it does not mean that evil is in harmony with God. I once came across a useful analogy of a rose growing up a ruined building, hiding its ugliness and covering it in flowers (it might have been from Nicky Gumbel; I can’t remember). The benefits that have come to my friend are the flowers over the ruin. God grows the flowers, but He does not ruin the building in the first place.
People who do not believe that it is always God’s will to heal must be rather baffled by the ministry of Jesus (our living example of God’s will, after all). So far as I am aware, there is no recorded instance of Jesus coming across a sick person and saying “Oh well, tough luck, God wants you to be ill.” He simply healed the sick, eagerly, indiscriminately, with compassion brimming over. He seems to have regarded sickness as something to be banished from the Kingdom.
I wonder if you might be confusing a belief that it is always God’s will to heal (which I believe) with a belief that God will always heal in answer to prayer (which I do not believe). At any rate, that is the only thesis advanced in your quotation from Dr Lloyd-Jones: he seems to argue that we have to deduce from the fact that healing does not always occur when we prayer that sometimes God wants people to be ill. But this is a glaring spiritual non-sequitur. As soon as one understands that God does not always get His own way on earth (which we should appreciate from Genesis 1 onwards), one knows that there are going to be examples of fallen-ness littered around us.
Posted By: Old Git on November 23rd 2007 at 00:04:00
Message Thread
- It's nearly midnight (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 22, 23:49:10
- That's something else I needn't be thinking about. (General Chat) - tudders, Nov 22, 23:51:23
- Yes (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 22, 23:53:35
- Seems like the ideal time for you an I to have a big old debate. (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 23, 00:01:43
- Wow, I shoulod come on at this time more often, no children, only grown ups (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:04:00
- What a waste of words ! (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 23, 09:25:46
- You do realise, of course, that tomorrow, all tomorrow (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Nov 23, 00:27:25
- And what is wrong with his noodliness ? (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Nov 23, 09:37:52
- Thanks for that, (General Chat) - tudders, Nov 23, 00:17:00
- It may be too many words for you, tudders (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:23:34
- And if you'd only hung back five ickle minutes you'd have discovered the truth. Hey ho. (n/m) (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Nov 23, 00:32:14
- Then you're easily fooled. (n/m) (General Chat) - tudders, Nov 23, 00:31:46
- It may be too many words for you, tudders (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:23:34
- Very interesting Mr Git - I hope he engaged with you on it ... (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 23, 00:09:01
- I hope he will too, it is HUGELY frustrating sending letters into the blue otherwise (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:12:56
- I'll keep Cafe Theology in mind - cheers! (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 23, 00:17:16
- OK, will do, thanks. And off the top of my head, for the history I recommend (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:21:52
- I'll keep Cafe Theology in mind - cheers! (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 23, 00:17:16
- That should read 'engages' with you ... (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 23, 00:09:36
- You really didn't have to do that, you know (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:13:53
- I hope he will too, it is HUGELY frustrating sending letters into the blue otherwise (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:12:56
- God is Dog backwards. (General Chat) - shoddy, Nov 23, 00:06:29
- that's all that any of us really know, the rest of it is just based on fairy tales... (n/m) (General Chat) - blindasabat, Nov 23, 08:07:29
- hell yeah. (n/m) (General Chat) - shoddy, Nov 23, 00:12:39
- Ah. I take back the "no children" thesis (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:09:19
- Wow, I shoulod come on at this time more often, no children, only grown ups (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:04:00
- Writing what? I'm bored now and won't sleep for hours. (n/m) (General Chat) - tudders, Nov 22, 23:58:11
- Late Night OG. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Nov 22, 23:56:00
- See above. How was your wank? (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:05:05
- I might not have been entirely honest, but rather appealing for the Laughter. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Nov 23, 00:30:40
- See above. How was your wank? (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 23, 00:05:05
- Seems like the ideal time for you an I to have a big old debate. (General Chat) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Nov 23, 00:01:43
- Yes (General Chat) - Old Git, Nov 22, 23:53:35
- That's something else I needn't be thinking about. (General Chat) - tudders, Nov 22, 23:51:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.