as i said below...

Starting the game in a 4-5-1 was not the mistake, we was overran with 5 in midfield. imagine how bad it would have been in a 4-4-2 with one of those 4 probably been hucks? the starting formation was correct.. not going 4-4-2 after 70 minutes and going for the winner was the mistake. Would rather lose 2-0 trying to win then lose 2-0 trying to hold out for a 0-0.

Posted By: Alan on September 18th 2007 at 22:15:49

Message Thread

such a negative formation (NCFC) - goodyncfc, Sep 18, 22:12:35
- as i said below... (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:15:49
  - exactly- the hard job is holding the nil nil (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 18, 22:17:23
    - exactly what i am saying. (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:20:14
- Hucks and Brown up front, what a striking partner!!! (n/m) (n/m) (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 18, 22:14:20
  - Hucks plays to his best up front when playng with a big target man.. (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:17:10
    - if Brown coul;d score (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 18, 22:18:48
      - He was playing at centre half though mate. (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:20:53
  - I bet it wasnt even them 2 up front more like 4-5-1 I reckon? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Sep 18, 22:15:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.