such a negative formation
which is ok if you hold on for a o-o but not so clever if you let in 2 late goals.think sky said they hit the woodwork 4 times. pissed off but not surprised.we will we win away again?another sad trip home for Cookie.is it just me or is our football crap at the moment.cant see i getting any better.what hope at wolves and man city?
Posted By: goodyncfc on September 18th 2007 at 22:12:35
Message Thread
- such a negative formation (NCFC) - goodyncfc, Sep 18, 22:12:35
- as i said below... (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:15:49
- exactly- the hard job is holding the nil nil (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 18, 22:17:23
- exactly what i am saying. (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:20:14
- exactly- the hard job is holding the nil nil (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 18, 22:17:23
- Hucks and Brown up front, what a striking partner!!! (n/m) (n/m) (NCFC) - XXL16, Sep 18, 22:14:20
- Hucks plays to his best up front when playng with a big target man.. (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:17:10
- if Brown coul;d score (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 18, 22:18:48
- He was playing at centre half though mate. (n/m) (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:20:53
- if Brown coul;d score (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 18, 22:18:48
- I bet it wasnt even them 2 up front more like 4-5-1 I reckon? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Sep 18, 22:15:45
- Hucks plays to his best up front when playng with a big target man.. (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:17:10
- as i said below... (NCFC) - Alan, Sep 18, 22:15:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.