it does, however,

reinforce the fact that the City board (and management) have much better resources to work with than most, and that we SHOULD NOT be finishing below PNE, Stoke, Colchester, Plymouth, Piswich and Burnley.

It would be lovely if the board could admit that they let us down - yet all they do is crow about how much better the fans are than at other clubs.

Posted By: east of hampstead on August 7th 2007 at 10:13:04

Message Thread

Ref Brandy's bullet point... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Aug 7, 10:01:51
- good marketing from both chase and current board (NCFC) - megson, Aug 7, 10:15:26
  - season tickets are good value (NCFC) - south, Aug 7, 10:30:33
    - yup totally agree (NCFC) - megson, Aug 7, 10:41:53
      - but when you have four children (NCFC) - south, Aug 7, 10:54:57
        
        yeah quite agree (NCFC) - megson, Aug 7, 11:07:01
- it does, however, (NCFC) - east of hampstead, Aug 7, 10:13:04
  - did you say that to them last night? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Aug 7, 10:48:48
  - Gate revenue is really only a small part of the funding of a football club though (NCFC) - Yellalee, Aug 7, 10:47:37
    - agreed (NCFC) - beckford, Aug 7, 11:29:12
      - large part, in terms of keeping the club running and equal with other clubs, but small (NCFC) - Yellalee, Aug 7, 11:31:58
    - disagree (NCFC) - beckford, Aug 7, 11:15:48
      - I would say it is important to have this to keep the club afloat, (NCFC) - Yellalee, Aug 7, 11:27:13
        
        spot on (NCFC) - megson, Aug 7, 11:36:55

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.