The problem is...

Neither the Doc nor Davenport are consistent performers.

We really need someone who is going to be dependable in that position. It only takes one error to gift a team an effort on goal when you're a CB, and we can't afford to have players who are liabilities (or have the potential to have a howler) playing there.

I'd rather get a proven Championship level performer in, than a Premiership reserve who hasn't really done anything to fulfill his potential.

I'm all for bringing in prospects, but CB is a position where we need solid performances immediately.

Posted By: Dog on August 6th 2007 at 10:19:56

Message Thread

So it is Davenport then...... (NCFC) - andross, Aug 6, 00:35:28
- The problem is... (NCFC) - Dog, Aug 6, 10:19:56
- oh god. please no. he is an awful defender and not worth signing! (n/m) (NCFC) - tommyraydesign, Aug 6, 08:43:36
  - but is he worse than the doc (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 6, 08:58:00
    - To be fair he was very good at first (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 6, 09:45:26
    - That would not be possible - would it?? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Aug 6, 09:00:46
      - i dunno, maybe davenport is marginally better than the doc. but not alot (n/m) (NCFC) - tommyraydesign, Aug 6, 09:21:29
        
        I think that's a little harsh on Davenport to be fair?? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Aug 6, 09:24:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.