To be fair he was very good at first

before being dragged down to the general level of sh*tness that the rest of the team was displaying consitently at the time.

I do wonder therefore if part of a more confident, upbeat unit he may recapture his old form.

Certainly better than Doherty but the jury would be out for a while.

Posted By: Jim on August 6th 2007 at 09:45:26

Message Thread

So it is Davenport then...... (NCFC) - andross, Aug 6, 00:35:28
- The problem is... (NCFC) - Dog, Aug 6, 10:19:56
- oh god. please no. he is an awful defender and not worth signing! (n/m) (NCFC) - tommyraydesign, Aug 6, 08:43:36
  - but is he worse than the doc (NCFC) - Dave in France, Aug 6, 08:58:00
    - To be fair he was very good at first (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 6, 09:45:26
    - That would not be possible - would it?? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Aug 6, 09:00:46
      - i dunno, maybe davenport is marginally better than the doc. but not alot (n/m) (NCFC) - tommyraydesign, Aug 6, 09:21:29
        
        I think that's a little harsh on Davenport to be fair?? (n/m) (NCFC) - capecodcarman, Aug 6, 09:24:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.