Yeah but the clause wasn't as cut and dry as a min fee but only after 2 seasons of failed

promotion bids. Yes it was punching above our weight, on a premiership quality striker. Yes it was a punt and a gamble that didn't come off but I think incompetance is a bit harsh? We have made our money back and perhaps a bit more and his goals have kept us up in the meantime. Looking back it would have been better to get a couple of young strikers from the lower leagues and strengthened other areas but that was just the board giving worthy what he wanted. i'm sure the board have learnt from this but I don't really think the clause itself has done any damage and I for one am glad he has gone in a way and think we can build a team with the money.

Posted By: stringersrevenge on June 30th 2007 at 22:10:31

Message Thread

Smudger, 1st wizard and arthur whittle are all the spawn of the twat chase and people are (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jun 30, 19:07:39
- trustworthy board? (NCFC) - Millo, Jun 30, 21:12:08
  - Without provocation? does Smudger not constantly attack those who support the board? (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jun 30, 22:32:16
  - Without provocation, does (n/m) (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jun 30, 22:13:55
- well if grant spends the money well (NCFC) - megson, Jun 30, 20:21:42
  - Yeah but the clause wasn't as cut and dry as a min fee but only after 2 seasons of failed (NCFC) - stringersrevenge, Jun 30, 22:10:31
  - But haven't we been aware of this for a long time? (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Jun 30, 20:54:45
- Really? (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Jun 30, 19:12:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.