This implies otherwise

"but the Sharp saga still leaves big question marks in my mind about our tactics and ability to negotiate with other clubs/agents over deals where other clubs are in the running"

You question our ability to negotiate with Sharp, ergo you blame the club for not signing Sharp, whereas it was obvious that he wanted to go to Sheffield United.

Posted By: duke of york on June 30th 2007 at 12:01:13

Message Thread

Earnie get out clause (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 10:48:29
- All the Billy Sharp proved is that he wanted to go back (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 11:16:21
  - I don't blame the club for him going to Shef U (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 11:42:31
    - This implies otherwise (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:01:13
      - I thinkwe have allowed ourselves to be messed about by him (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 12:03:47
        
        2 points (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jun 30, 12:07:19
        
        Fair enough. Don't want Sharp now anyway. i would rather have (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 30, 12:28:27
        
        Also what is to be gained by giving him a deadline? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:08:48
        
        And for those people hankering after Eastwood (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jun 30, 12:12:27
  - Agree - it is very, very simple - if a player doesn't want to come to Norwich, he won't (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Jun 30, 11:20:07
    - And if I want to eat crumpets for tea (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 30, 12:05:13
    - Unless he does, of course. (n/m) (NCFC) - tudders, Jun 30, 11:22:18
- Spot on! (NCFC) - Salopian, Jun 30, 11:12:17

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.