It's not just that they ones he brought in were poor

After we'd been told about the relegaiton wage cuts, I was epxecting the replacements not to be THAT good, to be honest. But I felt consoled by the fact that at least we weren't paying high wages and so we weren't going to f**k up the finances.

But now we learn that not only were they not very good players, but that we had agreed to pay them very, very high wages ...

Posted By: Old Git on April 27th 2007 at 12:01:36

Message Thread

The most annoying thing about our finance is how we fucked up the "quality vs wages" (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 27, 11:44:40
- The basic mistake (NCFC) - Creosote Ah Um, Apr 27, 11:53:06
  - it's sort of understandable though (NCFC) - Dave in France, Apr 27, 11:58:19
    - It's not just that they ones he brought in were poor (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 27, 12:01:36
      - Are they high though? (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 27, 12:06:10
        
        Well for a start (NCFC) - Creosote Ah Um, Apr 27, 12:10:39
        
        Whatever we pay Peter Thorne is too much (NCFC) - Army Boy, Apr 27, 12:27:58
        
        If you look at the accounts for our relegation season, the wages hardly dropped at all (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 27, 12:09:49
        
        Which, as I said below, could only destroy the motivation of those (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 27, 12:14:05
        
        Interesting to note isn't it (NCFC) - Creosote Ah Um, Apr 27, 12:16:53
        
        No pay cut ? (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 27, 12:20:59
        
        That's the way I see it (n/m) (NCFC) - Creosote Ah Um, Apr 27, 12:24:03
        
        Thats what I meant when asking are our wages that high? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 27, 12:34:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.