One rule for us and one rule for them eh ?
User Posted Link
This bit:
"An RSPCA spokeswoman said it had investigated whether the fox was caused unnecessary suffering and whether any legislation established to protect wildlife had been breached.
?We have investigated and concluded there are no grounds for a prosecution,? she said. ?An independent post mortem examination was carried out and found that the fox died from gunshot wounds and no evidence of other injury or trauma was found."
How can being killed for somebody else's pleasure EVER be necessary suffering ?
Posted By: Steve in Holland on February 2nd 2007 at 11:22:42
Message Thread
- One rule for us and one rule for them eh ? (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Feb 2, 11:22:42
- Doesn't seem to have been shot for pleasure, does it? (General Chat) - Old Git, Feb 2, 11:46:28
- ...not even Peter Thorne? (n/m) (General Chat) - Partial Angler, Feb 2, 11:33:29
- I have seen 4 dead foxes by the sides of roads this week, shows how quickly they (General Chat) - Lovely old McJob, Feb 2, 11:25:11
- Darwinian selection. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Feb 2, 11:27:22
- but if their tackle is as big as Lindford they won't be able to run!! (n/m) (General Chat) - Army Boy, Feb 2, 11:54:56
- Darwinian selection. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Feb 2, 11:27:22
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.