i'd agree with that
the signing of a 37 year old appeared to be panic and a sign of the problems we had at the time.
It still depressed me that said 37 year old is quickly turning into one of (possibly the) our most important players.
Dublin should be useful, worrys me that he is vital in TWO (cb and cf) positions.
That said i'm happy to have him here now, and he is proving his worth beyind doubt.
Posted By: megson on January 8th 2007 at 11:25:51
Message Thread
- Quiz question to get 2007 started - what do pants and Steve in Holland have in question? (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:10:32
- Look og, fine, I admit, Dublins been a good signing in all (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:23:32
- Wouldn't mind that Sheringham, actually (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:29:06
- as long as i can have teddy's missus. (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jan 8, 11:26:12
- Classless and fake. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 8, 11:29:07
- Sounds ideal (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:29:33
- Im convinced now that some on here look for things I say and take them out of context on (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:28:24
- Chav. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 8, 11:27:31
- lol, she's worth a pop i think, (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jan 8, 11:29:17
- Disagree. (NCFC) - Snakey, Jan 8, 11:42:32
- lol! nice girl (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jan 8, 11:43:25
- Disagree. (NCFC) - Snakey, Jan 8, 11:42:32
- lol, she's worth a pop i think, (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jan 8, 11:29:17
- Classless and fake. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 8, 11:29:07
- He wasn't a replacement for Leon (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 11:24:43
- So who was? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:25:31
- Haven't replaced him yet (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 11:26:36
- so why did worthington play him up front if he wasn't leons replacement? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:27:13
- Because Thorne is shit (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:29:37
- Because the other option was Thorne (who was injured at the time)... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 11:28:48
- so why did worthington play him up front if he wasn't leons replacement? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:27:13
- Haven't replaced him yet (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 11:26:36
- So who was? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:25:31
- Did you like my remark about the conference (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:15:22
- Actually (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:18:51
- pants in (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 11:16:31
- If you don't want to read into the reasoning of why I wasn't happy then don't (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:20:58
- pants out (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:19:03
- pants shake it all about (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:19:12
- shake your pants (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:22:20
- pants shake it all about (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:19:12
- seeing (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:16:11
- Anyway, dodgy English aside, I do indeed gladly admit I was wrong, although (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:13:58
- i'd agree with that (NCFC) - megson, Jan 8, 11:25:51
- Really? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:17:34
- What are you wibbling on about ? (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:21:48
- it excited me (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 11:14:46
- yeah but they did both arrive here on the stupid bus (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 11:13:15
- ha ha (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:14:34
- In question ? (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:11:24
- Needs da coffee - what do they have in COMMON, for the hard of understanding (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:12:21
- HNY very long holidays man. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 8, 11:13:32
- Needs da coffee - what do they have in COMMON, for the hard of understanding (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:12:21
- Look og, fine, I admit, Dublins been a good signing in all (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:23:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.