Did you like my remark about the conference

seen as he's just enjoyed bagging two against that level?

I stand by all I said OG, the scope of the signing in regards to the ambition of this club was very poor

Surely you can see that when the only player at this club capable of scoring at this level is Earnshaw

Posted By: pants on January 8th 2007 at 11:15:22

Message Thread

Quiz question to get 2007 started - what do pants and Steve in Holland have in question? (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:10:32
- Look og, fine, I admit, Dublins been a good signing in all (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:23:32
  - Wouldn't mind that Sheringham, actually (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:29:06
  - as long as i can have teddy's missus. (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jan 8, 11:26:12
    - Classless and fake. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 8, 11:29:07
      - Sounds ideal (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:29:33
    - Im convinced now that some on here look for things I say and take them out of context on (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:28:24
    - Chav. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 8, 11:27:31
      - lol, she's worth a pop i think, (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jan 8, 11:29:17
        
        Disagree. (NCFC) - Snakey, Jan 8, 11:42:32
        
        lol! nice girl (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Jan 8, 11:43:25
  - He wasn't a replacement for Leon (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 11:24:43
    - So who was? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:25:31
      - Haven't replaced him yet (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 11:26:36
        
        so why did worthington play him up front if he wasn't leons replacement? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:27:13
        
        Because Thorne is shit (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:29:37
        
        Because the other option was Thorne (who was injured at the time)... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 8, 11:28:48
        
        Yup (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:30:57
- Did you like my remark about the conference (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:15:22
  - Actually (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:18:51
  - pants in (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 11:16:31
    - If you don't want to read into the reasoning of why I wasn't happy then don't (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:20:58
      - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 11:22:01
    - pants out (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:19:03
      - pants shake it all about (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:19:12
        
        shake your pants (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:22:20
  - seeing (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:16:11
- Anyway, dodgy English aside, I do indeed gladly admit I was wrong, although (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:13:58
  - i'd agree with that (NCFC) - megson, Jan 8, 11:25:51
  - Really? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 8, 11:17:34
    - What are you wibbling on about ? (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:21:48
  - it excited me (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 11:14:46
- yeah but they did both arrive here on the stupid bus (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 8, 11:13:15
  - ha ha (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:14:34
- In question ? (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 8, 11:11:24
  - Needs da coffee - what do they have in COMMON, for the hard of understanding (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:12:21
    - HNY very long holidays man. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 8, 11:13:32
      - Yes (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:14:08
        
        I bet. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 8, 11:15:55
        
        Lovely (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 8, 11:21:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.