with the way things have actually turned out, maybe not
though i'm sure the idea of spunking between ?2.9m and ?3.5m on him was made with us still being in with a reasonable chance of making the play-offs and getting promoted
in which case the return on our investment in him would have been far more than any transfer fee would could ever hope to get for him (unless Chelski bought him off us...)
Posted By: blindasabat on January 2nd 2007 at 11:24:09
Message Thread
- Let's hope this sort of thing is true (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 10:21:18
- We have to sell but for at least ?6m (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Jan 2, 10:28:03
- why is he worth ?6m? (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:29:41
- Because he's got 17 goals this season (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Jan 2, 10:32:07
- so he has such a good record for wba (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:37:45
- only preston say nugent is worth 6 (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:34:15
- Troll. He is worth 6m because (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 10:30:52
- fuck off you cunt (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:33:15
- A player's worth has nothing to do with his replacement ? Of course it does... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 10:50:10
- earnshaw was not bought as an investment (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:52:48
- Surely any player is an 'investment'? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 2, 11:04:03
- not with a clause which he must have (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 11:12:59
- That woman deserved a slap... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 2, 11:21:22
- only if that clause was for the same amount we bought him for (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 2, 11:15:34
- well i can't see us making much of a profit (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 11:16:39
- with the way things have actually turned out, maybe not (NCFC) - blindasabat, Jan 2, 11:24:09
- Must admit I won't argue about what WILL happen. I think (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 11:23:51
- well i can't see us making much of a profit (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 11:16:39
- agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - duckandchips, Jan 2, 11:11:05
- Erm. Carl Robinson ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 11:13:02
- not with a clause which he must have (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 11:12:59
- Surely any player is an 'investment'? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 2, 11:04:03
- earnshaw was not bought as an investment (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:52:48
- A player's worth has nothing to do with his replacement ? Of course it does... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 10:50:10
- fuck off you cunt (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:33:15
- Because he's got 17 goals this season (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Jan 2, 10:32:07
- why is he worth ?6m? (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:29:41
- won't be up to him (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:22:45
- Below a certain value it might. (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 10:23:56
- no reason why he would reject a prem offer (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:26:04
- Well let's wait and see and cross our fingers and toes. I must say (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 10:28:50
- Will get higher wages in the Prem for a start (n/m) (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Jan 2, 10:28:35
- no reason why he would reject a prem offer (NCFC) - SCC 26, Jan 2, 10:26:04
- Below a certain value it might. (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 2, 10:23:56
- We have to sell but for at least ?6m (NCFC) - Tim Westwood, Jan 2, 10:28:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.