Only one thing wrong with that.

Haig directed a successful campaign. General John Pershing credited him at the time as 'the man who won the war'. It can be argued that he took an unprepared army and turned them in to a successful fighting force. He had to cope with poor communications, average weaponry and most importantly, a larger force fighting his army.

Of course, as is only right in England, a thorough debunking occurred. More recent historians such as Corrigan and Sheffield again assert him as a man who delivered the victory.

Posted By: InTheAbsenceOfAHorse on October 27th 2006 at 16:12:18


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in