and was the way it was intended

for me Crook and Grant pretty much have the same things going for them as against them and the only difference with Hunter is that he already knows the players, which could be a good thing or a bad thing depending on which way you want to argue it

so i'm interested to hear other's reasons for having a preference

Posted By: blindasabat on October 13th 2006 at 18:43:33

Message Thread

Oh No Not Grant (NCFC) - rastaheadz, Oct 13, 18:28:38
- why do you think Hunter would be better? (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 13, 18:30:41
  - Bit early for KTFing isn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 13, 18:35:06
    - Fairly straightforward question, I thought (n/m) (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Oct 13, 18:35:50
      - and was the way it was intended (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 13, 18:43:33
        
        This is where I'm doubtful (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 13, 18:54:30
        
        got to agree again (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 13, 19:09:43
      - Absolutely, but blindy has questioned every doubter without offering any analysis himself (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 13, 18:38:48
        
        see above ^^^ :-) (n/m) (NCFC) - blindasabat, Oct 13, 18:51:57
        
        HaHa - just noticed he's agreed with my post - top man! (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Oct 13, 18:39:13

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.