New info

Okay, so this is going to seem like backtracking, but the latest I hear is that the board are now investigating other avenues and that the name I had previously heard is no longer the preferred option. Apparently there may have been new developments in terms of availability etc.

I'm so f**king glad this is the case.

So now I'm a lot more optimistic - if it had been the person I'd heard I would have been gutted. He's still a candidate though so I guess it could happen.

Posted By: Hull Canary on October 2nd 2006 at 10:06:57

Message Thread

New info (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 2, 10:06:57
- Honestly... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Oct 2, 10:12:09
  - I'm certain that they did have a person who they wanted (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 2, 10:17:15
- All the rumours about who is getting the job are rubbish (NCFC) - conker, Oct 2, 10:10:43
  - agree (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 2, 10:19:04
  - They may have made informal (NCFC) - matgore, Oct 2, 10:15:20
  - I agree it's all hindsight at the moment. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Oct 2, 10:11:22
- Well can you tell us who they are now then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 2, 10:07:32
  - I'll think about it (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 2, 10:10:14
    - let's hear what you've heard then (NCFC) - ronnie, Oct 2, 10:20:11
      - maybe tomorrow (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Oct 2, 10:25:22
        
        Yawn ZZZZZzzzzzzzz (n/m) (NCFC) - ronnie, Oct 2, 10:31:58

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.