Slightly ridiculous idea IMO......

You appoint the manager to deal with the team. Then you say that you'll scrutinise the transfer to see if they are value for money.

Who is better placed to judge that? The footballing side or the business side?

I, for one, would be very suspect about, for example, Michael Foulger having a say in such things. He might know chickens and business well but, in general, I'd pick the footballing side to be the better judge of a footballer's worth to the club.

What the board should do is decide the amount available to the manager and then pass the responsibility to those appointed to do such a job.

Posted By: InTheAbsenceOfAHorse on September 27th 2006 at 11:59:37


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in