My views on sutton

For once I agree with Worthy. History should have taught us that you cannot turn the clock back - you have to move on. Walker was not a success second time around and neither IMO was Flecky.

We do probably need a target man but lets not go for a one year fix although as someone pointed out if we could actually start playing the ball in the ground then we could probably get away with earnie and mck.

Posted By: fond on August 3rd 2006 at 11:33:20

Message Thread

My views on sutton (NCFC) - fond, Aug 3, 11:33:20
- Why does comparing a transfer with another that didn't work out make sense? (NCFC) - pants, Aug 3, 11:39:13
- And where is this "non-one year fix" targetman? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 3, 11:36:57
- who plays when one is injured ? thorne ? (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Aug 3, 11:36:33
  - McKenzie. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Aug 3, 11:48:41
- Sutton (NCFC) - Muz, Aug 3, 11:35:55
  - Maybe but (NCFC) - fond, Aug 3, 12:14:16
  - Bizarre that loads hate ashton for last season, yet a player wants to play for us (NCFC) - pants, Aug 3, 11:41:44
  - ops missed this bit (NCFC) - Muz, Aug 3, 11:38:29
  - I agree we should sign him if there is no other alternative (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 3, 11:38:15
    - Like a jim brennan say? (NCFC) - pants, Aug 3, 11:48:14
      - He wasn't injured when we signed him (n/m) (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Aug 3, 11:58:22
        
        But he got injured straight away (NCFC) - pants, Aug 3, 12:02:41
        
        Yep, fair point (n/m) (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Aug 3, 12:07:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.