don't understand this

are you suggesting that if they paid ?7m plus Milner that would be treated as a no profit deal in terms of calculating our sell-on clause entitlement? because I am certain that wouldn't be the case. A value would have to be included for Milner.

Posted By: mr carra on July 18th 2006 at 10:29:02

Message Thread

Sorry if this is WW2 (NCFC) - conker, Jul 18, 10:10:29
- Can we spend the 15% on Michael Owen? (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 18, 10:11:31
  - We wouldnt make any money out of it! (NCFC) - conker, Jul 18, 10:15:55
    - don't understand this (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 18, 10:29:02
      - Think it is cash only. Otherwise they can wrangle it and Newcastle will (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 18, 10:31:13
        
        you're contradicting yourself there (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 18, 10:33:22
        
        Sorry I meant that the sell-on clause works on cash-only deals (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 18, 10:34:11
        
        if we agreed ... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 18, 10:37:50
        
        Yeah but I think it suits both parties AND Milner if they overvalue him... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jul 18, 10:51:27
        
        surely it won't suit West Ham, since they'll get less cash (NCFC) - mr carra, Jul 18, 10:55:46
    - perhaps we'll get a leg though? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tomblander, Jul 18, 10:23:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.