PM SCC, should that not be a red?! #DOGSO
Posted By: JD3 on June 18th 2026 at 23:32:44
Message Thread
- PM SCC, should that not be a red?! #DOGSO (n/m) (Other Football) - JD3, Jun 18, 23:32:44
- Surprised that didn't get reversed. (Other Football) - trafford_canary, Jun 18, 23:34:57
- It's his job to put him off (Other Football) - trafford_canary, Jun 18, 23:39:13
- Merest contact, 80% dive (n/m) (Other Football) - jamesward, Jun 18, 23:35:32
- But enough to put him off the opportunity (n/m) (Other Football) - Legacy Fan, Jun 18, 23:35:25
- Yes, ref got it wrong (n/m) (Other Football) - Charles21, Jun 18, 23:34:54
- Yes in my opinion. (n/m) (Other Football) - Legacy Fan, Jun 18, 23:33:53
- Although hang on. Bit of a dive. And DOGSO not valid in penalty area (n/m) (Other Football) - Legacy Fan, Jun 18, 23:34:23
- Unkel speaks. Have they got rid of the "genuine attempt to play the ball" distinction? (n/m) (Other Football) - JD3, Jun 18, 23:33:50
- It wasn’t a genuine attempt at all (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 00:12:48
- So yeah should have been a pen red inside (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 00:14:48
- if it had been inside of course (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 00:15:04
- So yeah should have been a pen red inside (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 00:14:48
- It wasn’t a genuine attempt at all (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jun 19, 00:12:48
- yup (n/m) (Other Football) - Tombs, Jun 18, 23:33:48
- Surprised that didn't get reversed. (Other Football) - trafford_canary, Jun 18, 23:34:57
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.