Ipswich players and staff unhappy

User Posted Link

Ipswich Town have hard questions to answer after Nigel Farage PR disaster

Nick Ames

Reform’s use of the football club has shocked fans and left the ownership red faced but how did it happen?


When photographs of Nigel Farage’s visit to Portman Road went viral on Tuesday morning, a wave of shock quickly spread among Ipswich Town’s staff. Some were furious, others genuinely devastated by the carelessness that saw the club allow itself to be leveraged for Reform UK’s political gain. The anger was palpable and hardly assuaged by an email sent to employees by the chief executive, Mark Ashton, who sought to douse the fire by stating there had been no intention to endorse Farage nor his policies.

The problem for Ipswich is that the horse has bolted. At best, they were grievously naive in letting Farage and his social media team run amok after arriving for a pre-booked stadium tour; a less generous reading would be that they simply stood by and let it happen, fully aware of Reform’s propensity to create sensation from the smallest gulp of oxygen. A photo of Farage holding an Ipswich shirt aloft, seemingly in their press conference room, was swiftly emblazoned as the banner on his party’s X account. Before long Farage, ever the opportunist, was launching a video from the scene and cockily linking himself with the Ipswich manager’s job.

There is no serious argument that Farage should have been banned from Portman Road. He is a private citizen and, regardless of political stripe, entitled to take a stadium tour. The salient questions are how much Ipswich were involved with his visit in advance and whether any attempts were made to avoid the club being piggybacked in public. And who, exactly, did Farage meet along the way? A handful of officials are understood to have had prior warning that he would be taking a privately-booked tour, although they deny Farage’s claim that he was in fact invited by Ipswich representatives. Any suggestions that Farage, who was in Suffolk for a party rally ahead of May’s local elections, engaged in meetings beyond a 30-minute tour or consumed anything beyond coffee and biscuits have also been robustly rejected.

In any case, Ipswich cannot claim to have been unprepared. They must also have known that, beyond the inappropriateness of facilitating a nakedly political visit, an outcry would follow about the identity of the guest. Many who grew up in a happily multicultural Ipswich, whose sizeable Afro-Caribbean population is fundamental to the town’s fabric, would be horrified by any association with Farage’s past statements, or Reform’s frequent scandals. Seeing Ipswich Town used as promotion for a man widely associated with xenophobia, alleged racist comments and an admiration for Donald Trump has, for a vast swathe of supporters, constituted a mortifying breach of trust from an institution that has underpinned their lives.

Naturally, for a party leading the polls, Farage and Reform have a portion of support among Ipswich’s fanbase. The town currently has a Labour MP but has swung back and forth to the Conservatives in recent elections. There remain plenty who wonder what the fuss is about, but anyone still contesting that sport and politics do not mix will find that old chestnut does not wash. They would certainly have been enlightened by listening in to the Ipswich squad’s dressing room on Tuesday.

Farage’s visit was openly discussed among the first-team players when they convened for training at their Playford Road base, several querying how he had been allowed to project himself from areas that are sacrosanct to them on a matchday. A diverse, particularly engaged squad was left unimpressed. It is the last thing Kieran McKenna needs, or deserves, as Ipswich prepare for an eight-game sprint towards promotion next month. Errors of this gravity touch every area of a club.

One wonders what the Albania international Anis Mehmeti, among a clutch of players away with their countries this week, made of Farage hanging a shirt on his peg at Portman Road. Farage has courted controversy in the past with comments about Albanians, making contested claims about the proportion currently in British prisons and taking aim at their contribution to an “invasion” by cross-channel migrants.

There was also distaste in seeing Farage parade around Ipswich’s home on the week that their women’s team, currently fighting to stay in the second tier, face Southampton in what has become an annual outing at Portman Road. That game, to be staged on Saturday, should draw a five-figure crowd but Farage’s past comments suggest he would hardly be endorsing it.

Asked about his views on women’s football in 2010, he said: “Here’s the bigger question. Do we think, chaps, when we’re there in the front line, when the balloon goes up, with fixed bayonets, when the whistle’s about to blow to go over the top, do we actually want to be there with women beside us? Do we? What an extraordinarily bizarre idea! I certainly don’t think so.” Ipswich Women, many of whom have overcome significant obstacles to enjoy an occasion of this scale, deserve much better than to see the buildup tarnished.

Internally, there is an acceptance that Ipswich made a mistake in granting Farage his platform. There is an appetite to revise their procedures around stadium tour visits, although it is rather too late for that. Some inside Portman Road have been deeply saddened, given that, in the five years since their takeover by the American group Gamechanger 20, they have made hugely impressive strides in re-engaging with all areas of the local community while creating a fresh, vibrant wider impression under the outstanding McKenna. It is desolating to see the effects of that work being undone, to a global audience, in real time.

It is also worth wondering whether Ipswich will learn their lesson at all. A statement, finally released at 5pm on Tuesday, said the club “remains apolitical and does not support or endorse any individual or party”. The sentiment is commonly used by football clubs who would rather hide behind rhetoric than front up to awkward truths.

The shocking optics of Farage’s appearance will distress Ipswich’s ownership, which has taken on new investors in the past 18 months. But the substance, or abject lack of it, looks no better. When does the apolitical lurch into the amoral? And when does turning a blind eye to anything signify that, in fact, you believe in nothing? Ipswich must now face these questions the hard way.

Posted By: norwaay on March 25th 2026 at 16:16:12

Message Thread

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in