Confusion continued
Things I've been mulling over:
Why was there such a volte face about league position last season? We were all relatively patient in terms of the rebuild season, (please note use of relatively), probably because of what had happened under Farke, so I don't think there were many who were expecting a top 6 finish.
If the main reason for JHT to go was losing the dressing room, thus ensuring that the top 6 wouldn't happen, why weren't questions asked about the choice of bringing a coach in who had zero experience of English football, without providing either his own team around him to support, or recommending an experienced English coach to help.
Instead of which, Jack Wilshere. Again, were no questions asked about why this was an acceptable thing to do - because I know I'd be pretty hacked off if someone was introduced as my successor when I'd only be in a role for three months. And let's not forget, we did all have a theory that we declined for a while when he arrived.
And then, Jack Wilshere part 2. Having been put into his planned role, he was then moved on, despite it seeming that, given that the dressing room was lost under JHT, he had won over the dressing room.
Then the squad. Given that last season was the rebuild season, surely there was some expectation that if we were changing coaching teams, perhaps we'd have to rethink recruitment to at least have a spine of a side - and especially when you think that Sargent wasn't expected to stay. It's fine to recruit for potential, that's been a successful model, but to actually have some money for the first time in a while and to not think - you know maybe we just need someone who's a bit proven, even if at League One level. We always seem to have the extremes - Ashley Barnes or Ante Crnac - surely there's some middle ground here.
Perhaps we could look to the youth. Where each week we seem to have a representative on the bench, occasionally on the pitch, but without any real evidence that there's going to be another source of potential future success there.
And of course, we now arrive at the point where we're firmly in the relegation zone, playing like a club heading to League One at best, and yet this time we want to be patient.
Manning talked about things starting to go wrong in February - if this were just about JHT losing the dressing room then surely it might have been won back by now. Or was there something more significant?
Anyway, curiouser and curiouser and I still think that we just need to bring in some people who understand football at exec level, not administrative or analytic level, and a manager who actually seems to want things to improve, not by osmosis but by direction. Again, I know that it's just a job, but some managers commit themselves to the club while they're part of it, which of course endears them to supporters, and I'm just not getting that.
And finally, we still have the person making decisions who gave George Long a three year contract.
Posted By: camcan on October 26th 2025 at 18:01:56
Message Thread
- Confusion continued (NCFC) - camcan, Oct 26, 18:01:56
- Logs in to say camcan for Chair (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 26, 21:31:55
- Girl (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Oct 26, 20:02:36
- Hard to disagree with that (NCFC) - paulg, Oct 26, 19:31:18
- Excellent. Best post I've read for a Long(!) time (n/m) (NCFC) - Bonjour, Oct 26, 19:04:37
- Excellent points, revealing more aspects of a garbled strategy. (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Oct 26, 18:57:28
- Can you send that to Attanasio, please? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 26, 18:48:34
- Hard agree with a lot of this. I think there is one decision that Knapper did quite well (NCFC) - jAC, Oct 26, 18:36:09
- Excellent post. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Oct 26, 18:33:12
- George Long and Sydney van Hooijdonk are possibly the two worst NCFC Championship players (NCFC) - norwaay, Oct 26, 18:26:44
- The Long decision was staggeringly awful... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 20:00:00
- I find it hard to blame Long entirely on Knapper (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 26, 19:04:20
- VMT. Brainboggling. (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 26, 19:25:46
- This is an excellent post (I should have added) (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Oct 26, 18:27:37
- Yes, all roads lead to knapper; an excellent summary of why he needs to go (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 26, 18:19:05
- Excellent George Long flourish to finish! ๐๐ผ (NCFC) - JD3, Oct 26, 18:15:15
- Itโs very inconsistent and hypocritical (NCFC) - footymadman, Oct 26, 18:06:06
- The bottom line ,IMO ...Knapper has just been crap. (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Oct 26, 18:16:42
- Yeh. He must interview very well (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Oct 26, 18:32:55
- Plenty of folks like that in life... (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 20:02:26
- Thatโs true (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Oct 26, 20:12:25
- I think he just said 'Arsenal' and they were sold... (NCFC) - Canarrojo, Oct 26, 18:44:14
- Blah blah blah data blah (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Oct 26, 19:32:17
- And weโve had absolutely nothing from Arsenal either. (NCFC) - lurd, Oct 26, 19:06:59
- Plenty of folks like that in life... (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 20:02:26
- Worse than crap (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 26, 18:19:57
- Chansiri has destroyed his club. (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 26, 19:05:28
- Unlike you to be disagreeable ๐๐๐๐ (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Oct 26, 22:13:32
- Because he sold the stadium. What if that happens to us also? How do we know it wonโt? (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Oct 26, 20:42:59
- Chansiri has destroyed his club. (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Oct 26, 19:05:28
- Yeh. He must interview very well (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Oct 26, 18:32:55
- The bottom line ,IMO ...Knapper has just been crap. (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Oct 26, 18:16:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.