USA has always had a lot more 'forwards' than strikers - Wrath of the Barclay

USA has always had a lot more 'forwards' than strikers

you could say much the same about Donovan.

Probably the last decent pure #9 they had was Brian McBride in the 90s

Posted By: NJ_Canary on September 6th 2025 at 22:00:21

Message Thread

Not-on-bench alert: Sarge starts tonight for the yanks against S. Korea (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Sep 6, 21:04:55
- Great, what could possibly go wrong! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 6, 21:08:05
  - He takes the wrong supplements pre match and gets pulled off at half time (n/m) (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, Sep 6, 21:46:59
  - Hopefully he scores a quick fire hatrick and gets promptly subbed. (n/m) (NCFC) - MORDENCANARY, Sep 6, 21:12:55
    - At least one of those things is a lock (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Sep 6, 21:18:35
      - To be replaced by who? (n/m) (NCFC) - Bertie Russell, Sep 6, 21:24:34
        
        Balogun, probably, or Downs (recently at CR with Southampton) (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Sep 6, 21:31:14
        
        Dempsey was probably their only ever decent striker, and to (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Sep 6, 21:51:59
        
        USA has always had a lot more 'forwards' than strikers (NCFC) - NJ_Canary, Sep 6, 22:00:21
        
        Balogun or Weah I’d imagine (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Sep 6, 21:28:17
        
        Balogun then. Weah playing wide (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Sep 6, 21:28:55

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.