Yep has to be that

And if he says in his report that he saw him get whacked in the head then he’s admitting he should never ref again

Posted By: SCC 28 on March 3rd 2025 at 10:40:20

Message Thread

That Hyam thug better be charged today (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 09:26:55
- Surely they won't as the red saw it? (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Mar 3, 10:24:45
  - He wasn’t looking at the same angle as the tv camera (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:38:27
    - He did have the same view I think. In the replay looking straight down the pitch (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:42:58
      - Yeah his positioning is better than I thought (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:54:56
        
        Gunn is also slightly behind Hyam when he hits him (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 3, 16:50:25
        
        Surely that’d be a ban in itself? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Mar 3, 16:27:03
      - We need a wobbly grainy film from a fan’s mobile 80m away to be sure (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 3, 10:49:15
        
        Gunn’s head went back and to the left….back and to the left (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 3, 13:06:08
  - He can't have seen what actually happened though or it would have been a yellow minimum (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:33:50
    - Yep has to be that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:40:20
- Well if Kenny at QPR was a ban then this has to be. (NCFC) - Chopper, Mar 3, 10:17:29
- The FA wont do a thing (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 3, 10:08:29
  - How much of your vast wealth would you bet on that? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:10:06
    - My last Rolo (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 3, 10:18:40
- FOREARM SMASH COULD HAVE KILLED HIM (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 3, 09:56:31
  - That's the problem though isn't it (NCFC) - Old Man, Mar 3, 09:58:57
    - I think based on this he should get done (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:03:36
      - Yes, and exactly why Kenny was done. Would be double standards not to charge (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:06:31
        
        We’d be getting into ‘agenda against Norwich’ territory (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:09:15
        
        Did they ever explain why that specific action got looked at? (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Mar 3, 10:32:04
        
        Because it was clearly violent conduct (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:42:52
        
        Off the ball is also a distinction I think (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:43:45
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Mar 3, 09:45:49
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 09:34:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.