Surely they won't as the red saw it?
He was looking straight at it and gave us a foul. Weird he didn't think it was even a yellow when clearly much worse than Kenny's but don't think he can say he missed it.
Posted By: Kangol Canary on March 3rd 2025 at 10:24:45
Message Thread
- That Hyam thug better be charged today (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 09:26:55
- Surely they won't as the red saw it? (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Mar 3, 10:24:45
- He wasn’t looking at the same angle as the tv camera (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:38:27
- He did have the same view I think. In the replay looking straight down the pitch (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:42:58
- Yeah his positioning is better than I thought (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:54:56
- Gunn is also slightly behind Hyam when he hits him (NCFC) - jamesward, Mar 3, 16:50:25
- Surely that’d be a ban in itself? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Mar 3, 16:27:03
- We need a wobbly grainy film from a fan’s mobile 80m away to be sure (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 3, 10:49:15
- Gunn’s head went back and to the left….back and to the left (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 3, 13:06:08
- Yeah his positioning is better than I thought (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:54:56
- He did have the same view I think. In the replay looking straight down the pitch (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:42:58
- He can't have seen what actually happened though or it would have been a yellow minimum (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:33:50
- Yep has to be that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:40:20
- He wasn’t looking at the same angle as the tv camera (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:38:27
- Well if Kenny at QPR was a ban then this has to be. (NCFC) - Chopper, Mar 3, 10:17:29
- The FA wont do a thing (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 3, 10:08:29
- How much of your vast wealth would you bet on that? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:10:06
- My last Rolo (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 3, 10:18:40
- How much of your vast wealth would you bet on that? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:10:06
- FOREARM SMASH COULD HAVE KILLED HIM (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 3, 09:56:31
- That's the problem though isn't it (NCFC) - Old Man, Mar 3, 09:58:57
- I think based on this he should get done (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:03:36
- Yes, and exactly why Kenny was done. Would be double standards not to charge (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:06:31
- We’d be getting into ‘agenda against Norwich’ territory (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:09:15
- Did they ever explain why that specific action got looked at? (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Mar 3, 10:32:04
- Because it was clearly violent conduct (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:42:52
- Off the ball is also a distinction I think (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:43:45
- Because it was clearly violent conduct (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:42:52
- Did they ever explain why that specific action got looked at? (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Mar 3, 10:32:04
- We’d be getting into ‘agenda against Norwich’ territory (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:09:15
- Yes, and exactly why Kenny was done. Would be double standards not to charge (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 10:06:31
- I think based on this he should get done (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 3, 10:03:36
- That's the problem though isn't it (NCFC) - Old Man, Mar 3, 09:58:57
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Augustus Pablo, Mar 3, 09:45:49
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Mar 3, 09:34:05
- Surely they won't as the red saw it? (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Mar 3, 10:24:45
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.