The warheads are ours, made here. The subs are ours. The missiles are made/serviced by US
We have operational autonomy BUT who'd bet against them suddenly not servicing our missiles any more, so I'd agree that we should look at alternative delivery systems with some urgency and have no doubt that's already happening.
I do wonder if the French policy might not be revisited in light of recent events.
Eight of the EU states currently have far right governments and there is significant far right presence in many states which don't. The far right, of course, loves Putin right off (because he likes to fund them so they will destabilise their respective countries).
I do think something will happen focused on defence at the European - not EU - level including us and Norway.
Interesting questions arise if we all sign up to mutual defence and Trump lands troops on Greenland, of course (more than the usual at the space base there).
Other interesting questions arise around the scope of this new thing (which I think is pretty much nailed on) - "defence" of course includes industrial capacity and hence terms of trade, in raw materials like metals and chemicals as well as finished bits of Shiny Kit(tm). So there'd have to be some kind of trade component allowing free movement of all the above. Then you need expertise from one place somewhere else, so people start moving around...it won't happen this way but you could see a proto-new-EU emerging from this, including some states like us not currently in the EU, not including states like Hungary and, latterly, Slovakia who are pro-Russia.
Brexit was a massive act of national self-harm but Breturn would be fraught with difficult questions (Schengen, Euro they'd give up but we'd need to make concessions to get them to; no rebates any more, of course) and I wonder if the defence focused thing isn't both very necessary in itself and a smart way to get better relations with some sensible stuff in place more broadly.
Posted By: Old Man on March 1st 2025 at 21:45:12
Message Thread
- 24 mar - breturn (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 1, 20:44:17
- Always inevitable as we knew how damaging exit was BUT (General Chat) - Legacy Fan, Mar 1, 23:20:35
- Oh ffs (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, Mar 1, 22:35:09
- never going to happen. (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:23:34
- Even though latest polling is about 65% to rejoin (General Chat) - jamesward, Mar 1, 20:51:42
- More because it would cost half as much to rejoin as it did to leave. Too much (General Chat) - Legacy Fan, Mar 1, 23:53:38
- Won't happen because it would be ludicrous (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, Mar 1, 22:38:31
- we'll see (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 1, 20:56:54
- Yes. I was sceptical but realignment now not out of the question. (n/m) (General Chat) - norwaay, Mar 1, 21:15:58
- indeed, and it seems you are now a big part of the equation (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 1, 21:26:52
- The move from the europeans to move away from NATO (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:31:17
- The warheads are ours, made here. The subs are ours. The missiles are made/serviced by US (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 1, 21:45:12
- The other issue is nuclear proliferation (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 1, 21:50:04
- it's the us that is moving away from nato toward russia (n/m) (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 1, 21:36:41
- yep. The europeans just wont pay their fair share. (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:40:14
- It’s nothing to do with shares (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 1, 21:43:02
- not any more. NATO is all but over. (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:44:34
- Weapons manufacturers? (n/m) (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Mar 1, 21:50:11
- Tyrants mainly (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 1, 21:48:27
- I agree. NATO doesn't meaningfully exist any more (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 1, 21:47:12
- actions have consequences (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 1, 21:53:14
- Virtue signalling.... (n/m) (General Chat) - phrankin, Mar 2, 11:30:54
- 😍 (n/m) (General Chat) - norwaay, Mar 1, 22:05:08
- This was good (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 1, 22:03:30
- Godt gjort! That's quite something! (n/m) (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 1, 21:55:08
- This has been coming for years. No-one wanted to listen. (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:48:54
- I didn't say it wasn't, and at least the UK has exceeded the notional target (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 1, 21:51:28
- They have made their own bed (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:54:23
- I didn't say it wasn't, and at least the UK has exceeded the notional target (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 1, 21:51:28
- actions have consequences (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 1, 21:53:14
- not any more. NATO is all but over. (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:44:34
- It’s nothing to do with shares (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 1, 21:43:02
- yep. The europeans just wont pay their fair share. (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:40:14
- Пизда (n/m) (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Mar 1, 21:35:34
- Толстая пизда (n/m) (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Mar 1, 21:36:20
- We best all start learning Russian (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Mar 1, 21:31:54
- ... (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Mar 1, 21:36:52
- The warheads are ours, made here. The subs are ours. The missiles are made/serviced by US (General Chat) - Old Man, Mar 1, 21:45:12
- The move from the europeans to move away from NATO (General Chat) - shoddy, Mar 1, 21:31:17
- indeed, and it seems you are now a big part of the equation (General Chat) - Tombs, Mar 1, 21:26:52
- Yes. I was sceptical but realignment now not out of the question. (n/m) (General Chat) - norwaay, Mar 1, 21:15:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.