Yep. Looking good on the eye is one thing.

But we’re not better than the teams around us, as we lack the quality to score as many as we should, and we make calamitous errors up and down the pitch that cost us goals almost every game. In aggregate, that does not make us “good” and not “better than these other teams”.

Posted By: Under soil heating on March 1st 2025 at 14:57:33

Message Thread

We are much much better than Blackburn and teams around us but seem to lack (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Mar 1, 14:38:06
- The downside of a young squad, with (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 1, 14:47:41
- Need a bit of experience in the squad and more leadership on the pitch (n/m) (NCFC) - Hit Squadie, Mar 1, 14:42:38
- The game management issue wouldn't take much to put right (NCFC) - LowestoftBoy, Mar 1, 14:42:33
  - You mean like our defending for the past few seasons.... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 1, 14:44:13
- We certainly have a squad capable of the Top 6 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 1, 14:41:50
- I dont get the "much better than teams around us" argument. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 1, 14:41:45
  - and we ship goals for fun... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 1, 14:43:37
    - Yep. Looking good on the eye is one thing. (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 1, 14:57:33
    - We don’t seem to be conceding as many ? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 1, 14:45:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.