If the deadline was Tuesday the panel would have been on standby. The three

members of the panel work independently and presumably remotely. The length of time to consider the appeal would depend on the evidence we submitted. Hopefully it wasn't 'incidents like that happen every game". I'm sure the original panel members are sent the appeal details electronically and simply asked does this new evidence cause you to change your original opinion.There is no reason why the whole process shouldn't be quick.

Posted By: The Gaffer on December 18th 2024 at 14:50:12

Message Thread

Press news in... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Dec 18, 14:00:27
- Didn’t we appeal Kenny on the Monday? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:17:20
  - No thats not how it works under the fast track process (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 18, 14:29:15
    - Sure I read he was banned on the Monday (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 18, 16:22:25
      - But he was making love by Wednesday? (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Dec 18, 16:51:55
    - If the deadline was Tuesday the panel would have been on standby. The three (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Dec 18, 14:50:12
    - Looks like we were trying to manipulate the process then (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:33:48
  - Please God don't put Long back between the sticks 🙏🏼 (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 18, 14:28:41
    - Long will play Saturday BMTP (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:29:30
      - Has a charge ever been defended? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 18, 14:37:05
        
        Found one! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:44:51
- ** DEFENSIVE MIDFIELDER ALERT ** (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 18, 14:11:56
  - Indeed. Interesting (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 18, 15:02:33

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.