Didn’t we appeal Kenny on the Monday?

And it was heard the next day and rejected?

Hardly outrageous that it coincided with a fixture and pretty dumb to appeal given the evidence we’ve seen! Should have been preparing for the game on the basis the appeal would be rejected. A concern tbh.

And would like to think we’ve already looked at the Gunn incident given he has until tomorrow to respond!

Posted By: SCC 28 on December 18th 2024 at 14:17:20

Message Thread

Press news in... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Dec 18, 14:00:27
- Didn’t we appeal Kenny on the Monday? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:17:20
  - No thats not how it works under the fast track process (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 18, 14:29:15
    - Sure I read he was banned on the Monday (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Dec 18, 16:22:25
      - But he was making love by Wednesday? (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Dec 18, 16:51:55
    - If the deadline was Tuesday the panel would have been on standby. The three (NCFC) - The Gaffer, Dec 18, 14:50:12
    - Looks like we were trying to manipulate the process then (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:33:48
  - Please God don't put Long back between the sticks 🙏🏼 (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 18, 14:28:41
    - Long will play Saturday BMTP (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:29:30
      - Has a charge ever been defended? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 18, 14:37:05
        
        Found one! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 18, 14:44:51
- ** DEFENSIVE MIDFIELDER ALERT ** (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Dec 18, 14:11:56
  - Indeed. Interesting (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 18, 15:02:33

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.