Conner on PinkUn has some very valid points about the McLean situation
If that was so bad then why wasn't Dunne banned in the same game for hitting Borja in the face so hard that he had blood running down his face?
Basically, they have set the bar so low for retroactive bans that there should be 3 or 4 happen in every game.
Also, if you look at the challenge at normal speed, I agree that it looks bad. If you play it frame by frame the Kenny is clearly just trying to block the guy (both of his arms are up at the same height as the would be in a block). If he has just swung his left arm then I can see the issue. He didn't, and it's the kind of block you see hundreds of times in every game.
If that is the threshold for a retrospective ban then the game really is in trouble.
Posted By: Kev on December 11th 2024 at 20:48:33
Message Thread
- Conner on PinkUn has some very valid points about the McLean situation (NCFC) - Kev, Dec 11, 20:48:33
- Should be interesting one to discuss on ref watch (n/m) (NCFC) - letsbehavinyou, Dec 11, 21:33:36
- he can make all the "valid" points he likes it matters not one jot (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 11, 21:07:55
- Normal speed the only way to judge the force (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 20:54:44
- Do you consider it to be such a bad foul that it is only the 2nd retroactive ban (NCFC) - Kev, Dec 11, 21:04:01
- That was JHT’s point also (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 11, 21:28:00
- Vmt and nobody was outraged by it at the time (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 21:15:19
- Some QPR fans were (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:17:45
- Not a replay like they have on social media. Just normal speed from a distance (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 11, 21:43:58
- Some QPR fans were (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:17:45
- Haven’t seen other incidents (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:08:41
- Including this one (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:17:20
- Looked serious to me (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:19:46
- So serious that there were no comments about it before last night (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:28:44
- I wasn’t aware of it until seeing the replay yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:36:36
- So serious that there were no comments about it before last night (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:28:44
- Fishers tackle was far far worse (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 11, 21:18:13
- Looked serious to me (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 11, 21:19:46
- Including this one (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 11, 21:17:20
- Do you consider it to be such a bad foul that it is only the 2nd retroactive ban (NCFC) - Kev, Dec 11, 21:04:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.