Someone needs to explain why the Kenny incident was even looked at
As far as I am aware they don’t routinely trawl through the videos of games to try and find incidents the officials missed and charge people. If they did they’d probably find three or four a match.
Leaving aside the ridiculousness of the decision to charge him and it being upheld, I’d like to know why the video was looked at. Did QPR make a complaint or have the (totally inept) matchday officials team taken it upon themselves to screw us over even more than they did during the game.
Posted By: Jim on December 10th 2024 at 19:11:19
Message Thread
- Someone needs to explain why the Kenny incident was even looked at (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 19:11:19
- MaccyD's staff at Loftus Road (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Dec 10, 19:55:16
- He probably did as he wanted Xmas off. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Dec 10, 19:32:54
- Kenny (NCFC) - Lookitsyellow, Dec 10, 19:32:25
- Happened twice to Borja against lutons (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Dec 10, 19:23:11
- 1 of the 3 people on the FA's Independent Regulatory Commission (NCFC) - Tombs, Dec 10, 19:21:15
- Kenny (NCFC) - Lookitsyellow, Dec 10, 19:16:34
- Could it have been in the referees report? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 10, 19:15:33
- JHT said he went to talk to the ref post match to show him some things (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 19:23:11
- I think so (n/m) (NCFC) - footymadman, Dec 10, 20:05:54
- JHT said he went to talk to the ref post match to show him some things (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 10, 19:23:11
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.