Gus, i'm not a Michael Jackson fan.....

I think he's bloody weird.....

But how could you have convicted him given the inconsistencies in the main witness' story?

Innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable doubt surely existed from the moment he admitted to changing the story and telling someone it hadn't really happened?

Posted By: BeverlyHills0201 on June 14th 2005 at 10:56:57


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in