I've probably said it before

and unpopular opinion klaxon, it was clear Pukki didn't want another crack at the Championship and we should have let him go. Not because we had Sargent, because no one would have predicted his development, but because we didn't have an Emi or Steipi to play to his strengths which was clear from the previous PL season.
As early as Huddersfield, Sargent showed he would have been the most effective striker in whatever system it was that Smith was playing but we stuck him back on the wing as soon as Pukki was fit.

Posted By: 51eve on March 30th 2024 at 14:55:05

Message Thread

Sargent is now as important to us as Emi, Pukki, Wessi and Hucks were. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Mar 30, 11:42:56
- I've probably said it before (NCFC) - 51eve, Mar 30, 14:55:05
  - In hindsight I agree (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 30, 16:42:47
  - Yeah I banged this drum too, completely agree (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Mar 30, 16:01:02
- Suppose the only thing to say is (NCFC) - Pam Demic, Mar 30, 12:08:00
  - For a club like ours best to sell high when we can (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 30, 12:15:22
    - “For a club like ours” (NCFC) - Chair_of_the_Bored, Mar 30, 14:27:24
    - Mate, he’s played often as a winger before this season. Look at the (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 30, 13:18:18
      - What I meant to add was - list of reliable goal scorers we have had (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Mar 30, 14:37:55
      - This... (n/m) (NCFC) - Lager top, Mar 30, 14:00:07
    - For a club like ours best to keep a striker (NCFC) - Pam Demic, Mar 30, 12:24:22

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.