So this is about Farke blimey

Thought he was sacked because we were playing rubbish and losing nearly every week.

Smith had the best PPG in our last 2 seasons so he’ll be defended to an extent while acknowledging he had to be sacked.

I don’t seek to debate the merits of xG and am aware some sites (subscription) are more accurate than others.

No idea why some people choose to get so argumentative about it

Posted By: SCC 28 on August 27th 2023 at 21:35:51

Message Thread

Another cracking win on xG yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 10:18:12
- No standardisation then? (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 14:54:50
  - Just poor impersonations (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 15:07:46
    - You what? (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 16:11:48
      - I haven’t flipped whatsoever (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:32:59
        
        You posted a link (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 19:59:36
        
        Arguments cunts like you choose to start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 20:31:33
        
        Pleasant (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 20:48:28
        
        So this is about Farke blimey (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 21:35:51
- 42 (n/m) (NCFC) - Deep Thought, Aug 27, 11:52:18
- Smashed them 🎩👆🏼 (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Aug 27, 11:39:56
- you've had another shocker (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Aug 27, 11:15:41
  - I’m absolutely delighted (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 11:18:37
    - So one nerd disagrees with the opinion of another nerd... (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 27, 12:26:19
- Think they exclude penalties too? (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 27, 10:39:39
  - The pen is included at 0.79 if you scroll back through (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 10:47:54
    - Norwich City have scored seven of their last ten penalties (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 16:10:51
      - Not sure why a few previous Norwich pens are relevant (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:36:14
        
        So you don't think that recent history is relevant (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 16:42:17
        
        It is, but such a tiny data set (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:58:30
        
        And 0.79 is apparently their historical conversion rate (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 17:02:33
        
        historical conversion rate (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 17:36:44
        
        It’s not meant as a predictor (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 17:45:57
        
        I doubt that clubs choose to overlook the obvious flaws. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 18:18:37

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.