Pleasant
My main objection to your endless spouting about xG is that you selectively use it, and other arbitrary data to lobby for the sacking of our most successful recent manager and in defence of one of our poorer recent managers.
That you seem to take any criticism of...
1) xG
2) VAR
3) vaccine hesitancy
So extremely personally is quirky and makes it a bit hard to debate, which leads to it degenerating into an argument.
I mean, I think my faith in a system/process/algorithm might be a bit shaken if I found two analyses coming up with different answers using what perportedly was the same process.
And you know how offensive I find the word you just used, so, I'll duck out of this now. Have a pleasant evening.
Posted By: Cardiff Canary on August 27th 2023 at 20:48:28
Message Thread
- Another cracking win on xG yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 10:18:12
- No standardisation then? (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 14:54:50
- Just poor impersonations (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 15:07:46
- You what? (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 16:11:48
- I haven’t flipped whatsoever (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:32:59
- You posted a link (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 19:59:36
- Arguments cunts like you choose to start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 20:31:33
- Pleasant (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 20:48:28
- So this is about Farke blimey (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 21:35:51
- Pleasant (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 20:48:28
- Arguments cunts like you choose to start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 20:31:33
- You posted a link (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 19:59:36
- I haven’t flipped whatsoever (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:32:59
- You what? (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 16:11:48
- Just poor impersonations (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 15:07:46
- 42 (n/m) (NCFC) - Deep Thought, Aug 27, 11:52:18
- Smashed them 🎩👆🏼 (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, Aug 27, 11:39:56
- you've had another shocker (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Aug 27, 11:15:41
- I’m absolutely delighted (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 11:18:37
- So one nerd disagrees with the opinion of another nerd... (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 27, 12:26:19
- I’m absolutely delighted (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 11:18:37
- Think they exclude penalties too? (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 27, 10:39:39
- The pen is included at 0.79 if you scroll back through (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 10:47:54
- Norwich City have scored seven of their last ten penalties (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 16:10:51
- Not sure why a few previous Norwich pens are relevant (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:36:14
- So you don't think that recent history is relevant (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 16:42:17
- It is, but such a tiny data set (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:58:30
- And 0.79 is apparently their historical conversion rate (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 17:02:33
- historical conversion rate (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 17:36:44
- It’s not meant as a predictor (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 17:45:57
- I doubt that clubs choose to overlook the obvious flaws. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 18:18:37
- It’s not meant as a predictor (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 17:45:57
- historical conversion rate (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 17:36:44
- And 0.79 is apparently their historical conversion rate (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 17:02:33
- It is, but such a tiny data set (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:58:30
- So you don't think that recent history is relevant (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 16:42:17
- Not sure why a few previous Norwich pens are relevant (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 16:36:14
- Norwich City have scored seven of their last ten penalties (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Aug 27, 16:10:51
- The pen is included at 0.79 if you scroll back through (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 10:47:54
- No standardisation then? (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Aug 27, 14:54:50
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.