Well we don't know what the offered terms were

Maybe they wanted him out all season so only offered him for the full year or not at all, or their fee for a more flexible loan was so much higher than a fixed season loan that it wasn't much more just to get him for the year.

Posted By: Legacy Fan on January 13th 2023 at 11:54:18

Message Thread

That loan deal for Hayden is a shocker (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 13, 11:44:23
- It was a loan to perm deal I recall (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Jan 13, 15:54:40
  - Yes, this is almost certainly the reason (NCFC) - jamesward, Jan 13, 17:09:27
- I thought it's because a loan deal is actually a transfer legally. (NCFC) - Lentil Weaver, Jan 13, 15:30:25
- We had to take a risk, we couldnt afford an off the shelf (NCFC) - Azteca, Jan 13, 12:41:03
  - Agreed, if somebody was proven and injury free... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 13, 13:15:15
- I think it's clear... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 13, 12:26:18
- I'm pretty sure it was mentioned somewhere NUFC are paying about 90% of his wages (n/m) (NCFC) - Gazzaman, Jan 13, 11:58:54
  - so, to be clear (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jan 13, 20:10:23
  - according to the Mail were paying £20k, Newcastle £30k, not great business that!! (NCFC) - Gazzaman, Jan 13, 12:00:44
    - Newcastle paying more than half (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Jan 13, 12:17:36
    - 20k a week - that's fairly decent business these days isn't it?! (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Jan 13, 12:16:40
- Well we don't know what the offered terms were (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Jan 13, 11:54:18
- And I'm sure he's shrunk a bit from his Newcastle days (NCFC) - Dracula, Jan 13, 11:49:38

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.