I think the conclusion from today would be the opposite
that we set up pretty well and got ourselves into positions to win the game. But threw it away because of too many individual errors, from players who aren't all that good.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on October 8th 2022 at 17:11:09
Message Thread
- The conclusion from today (NCFC) - fal5taff, Oct 8, 17:09:00
- ^^100% this^^ (NCFC) - Kev, Oct 8, 17:16:38
- I think the conclusion from today would be the opposite (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 8, 17:11:09
- Absolutely agree. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 8, 18:01:01
- Not for me Clive (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Oct 8, 17:19:43
- i hear you. but how many players would you swap out for other champs players? (NCFC) - fal5taff, Oct 8, 17:13:04
- good question (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 8, 17:15:35
- i agree on both of those actually - but there is proper quality elsewhere in this team (NCFC) - fal5taff, Oct 8, 17:16:40
- good question (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 8, 17:15:35
- Plenty that have won champ at a canter twice tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 8, 17:12:02
- VMT, proven winners at this level. the passing is poor.... (NCFC) - fal5taff, Oct 8, 17:15:26
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Oct 8, 17:10:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.