difficult isnt it, If Say Ian Crook came in surely this would

just resuilt in arguments with the manager, Worthy's focus (as seen in his newspaper articles) is very much the long ball and big strong players.

Posted By: phrankin on May 5th 2006 at 00:07:59

Message Thread

It's obvious why Foley was sacked.... (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, May 4, 22:11:07
- But Worthy wanted to keep Boothroyd (NCFC) - trt354, May 4, 23:38:39
  - If you had ever watched them train at Colney (NCFC) - trt354, May 4, 23:52:26
    - not entirely true - He has often been seen urging his full backs (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:55:59
      - We'll just have to agree to differ (NCFC) - trt354, May 5, 00:01:06
        
        difficult isnt it, If Say Ian Crook came in surely this would (NCFC) - phrankin, May 5, 00:07:59
  - probably cos he wasa ordered to train hoofball (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:39:30
- worthy was involved in his sacking... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:21:12
  - how do you know? (n/m) (NCFC) - Poirot, May 4, 23:24:41
    - It is implied in Neil Doncasters latest peice: (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:37:26
    - Because it gives another convenient stick to beat NW with. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 4, 23:26:31
      - It is implied in Neil Doncasters latest peice: (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:51:35
- What a load of shite. Obvious my arse. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 4, 22:46:22
- hopefully axel will be the start of the cull (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, May 4, 22:12:01
  - everyone's a winner (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 22:15:32
    - wasn't that hot chocolate? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, May 4, 22:17:38
      - could have been, certainly wasn't anything to do with Steve Mcclaren (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 22:19:53
  - lol... yeah fingers crossed (n/m) (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, May 4, 22:13:42

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.