But Worthy wanted to keep Boothroyd

Still why let facts get in the way of a good fantasy. Where your evidence that the current players preferred Foley. Seemed very negative when I spoke to him in the last year

Posted By: trt354 on May 4th 2006 at 23:38:39

Message Thread

It's obvious why Foley was sacked.... (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, May 4, 22:11:07
- But Worthy wanted to keep Boothroyd (NCFC) - trt354, May 4, 23:38:39
  - If you had ever watched them train at Colney (NCFC) - trt354, May 4, 23:52:26
    - not entirely true - He has often been seen urging his full backs (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:55:59
      - We'll just have to agree to differ (NCFC) - trt354, May 5, 00:01:06
        
        difficult isnt it, If Say Ian Crook came in surely this would (NCFC) - phrankin, May 5, 00:07:59
  - probably cos he wasa ordered to train hoofball (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:39:30
- worthy was involved in his sacking... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:21:12
  - how do you know? (n/m) (NCFC) - Poirot, May 4, 23:24:41
    - It is implied in Neil Doncasters latest peice: (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:37:26
    - Because it gives another convenient stick to beat NW with. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 4, 23:26:31
      - It is implied in Neil Doncasters latest peice: (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 23:51:35
- What a load of shite. Obvious my arse. (NCFC) - Arganth, May 4, 22:46:22
- hopefully axel will be the start of the cull (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, May 4, 22:12:01
  - everyone's a winner (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 22:15:32
    - wasn't that hot chocolate? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 26, May 4, 22:17:38
      - could have been, certainly wasn't anything to do with Steve Mcclaren (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 4, 22:19:53
  - lol... yeah fingers crossed (n/m) (NCFC) - Wimbledon Canary, May 4, 22:13:42

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.