Exactly. For a club that batters on about buying players with resale

What an incredible waste. Utterly at odds with stated strategy. We now have literally nothing to show for all that money.

As far as I can see, Brentford loaned in a reserve keeper only. To cover an injury if memory serves? And they got Erickson on a short term deal. Otherwise they have signed young players that improved their squad on longer deals.

Posted By: Under soil heating on May 1st 2022 at 14:14:39

Message Thread

Can't see us getting much more than 10 million for Max the way his season has gone (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 1, 12:43:55
- Well clearly we wouldn’t sell him for that (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, May 1, 12:59:50
  - Hopefully not, just fail to see us getting 20+ million for him (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 1, 13:03:51
    - Maybe Max will stay to help us get up again and then sell after a successful promotion (n/m) (NCFC) - ChampsChamps2023, May 1, 13:05:45
- Safe to say Max’s star has faded this season (NCFC) - Under soil heating, May 1, 12:55:34
  - Bitter memories (NCFC) - ParrotPuncher, May 1, 13:05:59
    - The flaw there is that they have cost as much as a signing (NCFC) - CWC, May 1, 13:31:02
      - Exactly. For a club that batters on about buying players with resale (NCFC) - Under soil heating, May 1, 14:14:39
    - It’s not just Webber. It’s not just Smith or Farke (NCFC) - jamesward, May 1, 13:21:59
      - the players as well (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 1, 13:57:54
- With the calibre of clubs that continue to be linked with interest in him, you'd hope for (n/m) (NCFC) - JD3, May 1, 12:52:42

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.