an even more blatant offside given against Man Utd yesterday
not sure there is a conspiracy here - it's just an absolutely s**t implementation of the offside law.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on March 13th 2022 at 14:22:17
Message Thread
- I simply dont understand the offside rule then, if that isnt offside. (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 13, 14:18:54
- I agree with Goreham, Kabak played it because Bamford was there (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Mar 13, 14:22:13
- The rule is fine (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 13, 14:26:39
- Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:22:27
- Big club bias. Leeds the big club today, so goal stands (n/m) (NCFC) - NorskyNormann, Mar 13, 14:22:10
- We keep seeing these goals given tbf and it’s shit (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:19:36
- Well one was given against Man U yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:22:07
- No way that goal gets given against a Liverpool / city (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 13, 14:21:00
- an even more blatant offside given against Man Utd yesterday (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 13, 14:22:17
- Yep it’s a joke (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:23:23
- an even more blatant offside given against Man Utd yesterday (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 13, 14:22:17
- I agree with Goreham, Kabak played it because Bamford was there (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Mar 13, 14:22:13
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.