I agree with Goreham, Kabak played it because Bamford was there - Wrath of the Barclay

I agree with Goreham, Kabak played it because Bamford was there

Otherwise would have left it to Krul. Time to go back to the old rule, when you are in an offside position you are offside.

Posted By: watfordcanary on March 13th 2022 at 14:22:13

Message Thread

I simply dont understand the offside rule then, if that isnt offside. (n/m) (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 13, 14:18:54
- I agree with Goreham, Kabak played it because Bamford was there (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Mar 13, 14:22:13
  - The rule is fine (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 13, 14:26:39
  - Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:22:27
- Big club bias. Leeds the big club today, so goal stands (n/m) (NCFC) - NorskyNormann, Mar 13, 14:22:10
- We keep seeing these goals given tbf and it’s shit (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:19:36
  - Well one was given against Man U yesterday (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:22:07
  - No way that goal gets given against a Liverpool / city (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 13, 14:21:00
    - an even more blatant offside given against Man Utd yesterday (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 13, 14:22:17
      - Yep it’s a joke (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 13, 14:23:23

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.