Interesting would be

If people started discussing (other than on here) the rather obvious point that most prem clubs are owned by unsavoury characters. If Chelsea then why not the others?

Posted By: paulg on February 28th 2022 at 08:36:41

Message Thread

interesting dilemma (Other Football) - Tombs, Feb 28, 07:49:27
- They should say, Russian Chelsea owner, go fuck yourself (n/m) (Other Football) - Bravo win or die, Feb 28, 09:48:16
  - It’s what most of the Ukrainians are saying on Twitter videos 😁 (n/m) (Other Football) - NorskyNormann, Feb 28, 12:54:31
  - This is a great line, missed by the wrath (n/m) (Other Football) - Charles21, Feb 28, 11:25:25
  - ^potty mouth (n/m) (Other Football) - Chris Peacock, Feb 28, 11:22:17
- Interesting would be (Other Football) - paulg, Feb 28, 08:36:41
  - There’s “unsavoury” and then there’s (Other Football) - Old Git, Feb 28, 08:58:41
    - in some cases (of ownership) the distinction is a fine one (Other Football) - paulg, Feb 28, 09:15:09
      - mh17 (n/m) (Other Football) - Chris Peacock, Feb 28, 10:38:37
      - I wonder what MOTD will say the next time Saudi Arabia executes a journo it doesnt like? (Other Football) - Under soil heating, Feb 28, 09:21:48
        
        turn a blind eye for as long as easy & profitable (Other Football) - paulg, Feb 28, 09:34:40
- If I was cynical this might best be described as (Other Football) - Under soil heating, Feb 28, 08:09:04
- Not just unsure if they will, unsure if they even can due to Charity Commission rules (n/m) (Other Football) - NxNW, Feb 28, 08:07:28
- No Mary option = not an interesting dilemma (n/m) (Other Football) - Old Git, Feb 28, 08:00:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.