And, I still think we shd go with Kabak up front
wld be hilarious - smash it in the box, mazy runs, big ol headers - proper park stuff, f**k the tika crap Shakers, it's Wimbledon 1980
Posted By: paulg on January 11th 2022 at 13:33:01
Message Thread
- And, I still think we shd go with Kabak up front (NCFC) - paulg, Jan 11, 13:33:01
- Kabak to back attack..... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 11, 15:51:09
- Overlapping CB/Striker (n/m) (NCFC) - NorskyNormann, Jan 11, 13:54:54
- Kafront at the back? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jan 11, 13:34:15
- Cantwell could play instead of Cantbadly (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 11, 13:38:21
- or Cantplay (I've picked up a "knock") (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jan 11, 13:42:26
- Afront in the stands (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jan 11, 13:36:34
- Cantwell could play instead of Cantbadly (NCFC) - Charles21, Jan 11, 13:38:21
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.