We didn't buy a decent (obviously we can't afford brilliant) big, athletic striker
That one decision alone doomed us before a ball was even kicked. Pukki (and I love him) simply does not have the attributes, pace or strength, to play lone striker in the Prem. One of the reasons our attacking midfielders can't score goals (and that was striking both last time, with Buendia, Hernandez & Stipermann all scoring plenty in the Champs but almost zero in the Prem, and this time when they have literally zero) is that Pukki can't hold the ball up to give those players time to get around him and play off him, or distract defenders to create space. Any long ball to Pukki is basically conceding possession.
Even Sargent (who is pretty hopeless) usually makes us look better when he's on the pitch simply because he has the athleticism/physicality to disrupt Prem defenders. Even an average one would make us way better. Should have focused money there (and DM), not on endless defenders and lightweight attacking midfielders who are all much of a muchness with the players we already had.
Posted By: mr carra on December 15th 2021 at 07:14:40
Message Thread
- Last night needs some perspective, we had so many players missing. (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Dec 15, 06:57:15
- Rashica as well. Missing half our first team (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Dec 15, 07:11:23
- Agreed. Lots of overreaching analysis of what it says about summer recruitment last. Odd. (n/m) (NCFC) - Verity Lines, Dec 15, 07:03:10
- Except you can't separate them (NCFC) - camcan, Dec 15, 08:35:38
- To be fair we had TEN out once Kabak limped off including (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 15, 09:13:53
- We didn't buy a decent (obviously we can't afford brilliant) big, athletic striker (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 15, 07:14:40
- I expect they thought Sargent would be that player (NCFC) - matt in london, Dec 15, 08:53:44
- Might turn out to be reasonable points but not sure what that's got to do with last night (n/m) (NCFC) - Verity Lines, Dec 15, 08:02:36
- because it's largely responsible for our style of play (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 15, 08:17:36
- Did you watch the match in Saturday, out of interest? (n/m) (NCFC) - Verity Lines, Dec 15, 08:21:12
- because it's largely responsible for our style of play (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 15, 08:17:36
- Hugill? (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 15, 07:32:53
- Maybe... (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 15, 07:44:11
- I concur (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 15, 07:50:37
- Maybe... (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 15, 07:44:11
- Except you can't separate them (NCFC) - camcan, Dec 15, 08:35:38
- Can’t believe I was missing Sargent so much. (n/m) (NCFC) - Biggles, Dec 15, 07:01:50
- Gives us something different and an out ball. (n/m) (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Dec 15, 07:58:37
- I agree (NCFC) - inutero, Dec 15, 07:08:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.